Best News Stories & Information

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

UNESCO Chair admits organization was founded to push global governance

Source :

Under President Barack Obama, US restated its commitment to work close with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

By Jurriaan Maessen, Aug 21, (infowars) -- This is another clear-cut example of Obama intent on joining ranks with an organization that feverishly promotes global governance.

Conspiracy theory? Unfortunately not.

During a meeting in 2009, Mr. Olabiyi Babalola Joseph Yai (pictured), Chair of UNESCO’s executive board, admitted the organization was created to “think global governance”:

You will recall, dear colleagues, that I said, before Mr Ban Ki Moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, that UNESCO’s role is to think global governance. That is why the Organization was founded. We come to the rescue of the system especially when the economic machine runs out of steam, as it clearly has today. It is thus a matter of urgency to set up a long-term working group on global governance. I hope that a State or group of States will seize on this worthy proposal, and that the Organization, as of this session, will give it the attention it warrants.”

The Chair also had a word or two on the current US president:

“And as the election of Barack Hussein Obama reconciles America with itself, and with the world, it invites to say, in solidarity, “I too am America”, and gives us “the audacity of hope” for the real return of the United States to this Organization.”

At her instalment as Secretary-General of UNESCO in October 2010, Irina Bokova stated:

“I am convinced of the need for global governance, founded on universal ethics, in order to take up these common challenges.”

These statements do not fall out of the clear blue sky. UNESCO’s founder, Vice President of the Eugenics Society and foremost transhumanist Julian Huxley explained why global governance is crucial in his UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy:

“Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

Another “founding father” of the scientific dictatorship, Sir Bertrand Russell explained:

“Every government

that has been in control of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen …”

Obama's US Assassination Program? by Chuck Norris

Obama's US Assassination Program? Part 1Sound too conspiratorial to be true? Like the cover-up ops of spy novels? Well, it's reality. And it is possibly the most bizarre, inhumane and abusive way that the White House is expanding its power over the American people.

It's not an extremist belief or theory of the far right. It's a fact that has been confirmed by The New York Times, The Washington Post and MSNBC and even documented by the far-left online magazine

And it's the gravest nightmare of U.S. citizens and abandonment of our Constitution to date: a presidential assassination program in which U.S. citizens are in the literal scopes of the executive branch based upon nothing more than allegations of terrorism involvement as the branch defines it.

Of course, the CIA has executed covert assassinations of foreigners for decades. But tragically, Obama is expanding this program to include American, non-Islamic, stateside, homegrown terrorists.

It all started in January, when The Washington Post reported: "As part of the operations, Obama approved a Dec. 24 strike against a (Yemeni) compound where a U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi, was thought to be meeting with other regional al-Qaeda leaders. Although he was not the focus of the strike and was not killed, he has since been added to a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing or capture."

"A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"?

That's right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

While the Obama administration continues its Bush-blaming for the economy, it is mega-morphing Bush policy in covert ops overseas, which was, according to the Post, "to kill U.S. citizens abroad if strong evidence existed that an American was involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests."

Well, in recent weeks, the Obama administration has taken this overseas killing op to a new low: stateside assassinations.

A former director of national intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, confessed before Congress: "We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that."

If you are wondering who the "we" are to whom Adm. Blair refers, they are Smith, Wesson and the White House.

Now we know what deputy national security adviser John Brennan meant when he admitted in May, "And under President Obama, we have built upon the work of the previous administration and have accelerated efforts in many areas." (Remember when Bush's eavesdropping on U.S. citizens seemed harsh?)

Brennan further explained then that the problem of homegrown terrorists ranks as a top priority because of the increasing number of U.S. individuals who have become "captivated by extremist ideology or causes." He went on to say, "There are ... dozens of U.S. persons who are in different parts of the world and ... are very concerning to us."

Do you think "different parts of the world" doesn't include their country of origin?

Conveniently, the Obama administration also is integrating a pervasive plan to ensure the termination of radicals as the feds deem them abroad and domestic, too, with the resurrection of the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, introduced by Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif. Also known as H.R. 1955, it was passed in the House by the Democratic majority but was rejected by the Senate.

Everyone thought that legislation was dead until the Obama administration resurrected its tenets in its 52-page "National Security Strategy," released in May. So alarming is the feds' potential abuse of power that officials from London to the Kremlin are recognizing the threat to U.S. citizens.

The European Union Times reported, "Foreign Ministry reports circulating in the Kremlin today are warning that an already explosive situation in the United States is about to get a whole lot worse as a new law put forth by President Obama is said capable of seeing up to 500,000 American citizens jailed for the crime of opposing their government."

Woodrow Wilson, during his reign as president, incarcerated more than 2,000 U.S. citizens for speaking out against the government. And now for the first time since, a U.S. president is highlighting the threats of homegrown terror and literally hunting U.S. citizens as terrorists. One senior administration official said, "For the first time since 9/11, the (national security strategy) integrates homeland security and national security."

And what type of "integration" does that entail?

President Obama explained in an often overlooked statement within the "National Security Strategy": "We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. ... This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home."

Could it be any clearer? Right out of the horse's mouth. Or do I need to spell out what "fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home" means?

Remember the words "a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"?

That's right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

Obama's US Assassination Program? Part 2

Last week, I gave evidence of how the Obama administration is importing its overseas policy of assassination and implementing it stateside against U.S. citizens it deems as radical threats to American security and safety. (If you have not read Part 1, please do so before you read the rest of Part 2.)

I will reiterate a couple of key points. Deputy national security adviser John Brennan explained that the problem of homegrown terrorists ranks as a top priority because of the increasing number of U.S. individuals who have become "captivated by extremist ideology or causes." He went on to say, "There are ... dozens of U.S. persons who are in different parts of the world and ... are very concerning to us."

A former director of national intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, even confessed before Congress: "We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that."

President Barack Obama himself explained in an often overlooked statement within the "National Security Strategy": "We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. ... This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home."

Now it finally is coming to light why, back on Dec. 16, President Obama signed an executive order "designating Interpol as a public international organization entitled to enjoy certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities."

It all comes down to one basic verb. Can you find it in the following paragraph?

Obama's executive order reads, "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL)..."

There's the magic verb: "to extend"!

As I wrote earlier in the year in a column on Interpol, titled "Obama's Secret Vault," is it also just coincidental that Interpol is exempt from typical American search and seizure laws?

Anyone still not connecting the dots?

There is one more titanic element that I must stress. The one overriding dilemma for Americans in Obama's hunt for homegrown terrorists is that he has changed the definitions of terrorism and terrorists. Their definitions no longer necessarily include or imply Islamic extremism or extremists.

Don't ever forget: Obama and his administration repeatedly have played down the actual threat of terrorism by Islamic jihadists. As a presidential candidate in 2008, Obama promised to close down Gitmo in the first year of his presidency because, he said, it was an affront to American values and justice. He also promised to end the "warrantless wiretaps" of George W. Bush. In March 2009, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano proclaimed there is no terrorism -- only "man-caused disasters." In the same month, the Obama administration also proclaimed that there are "no enemy combatants" and "no war on terror" -- only "overseas contingency operations." And in May 2010, Brennan, Obama's top counterterrorism adviser, added, "Nor we do describe our enemy as 'jihadists.'"

Therefore, we are left to wonder: To the Obama administration, what exactly qualifies as radical extremism and terrorism, and who is on its "shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"? Consider even now who might fall into this category of non-Islamic, non-jihadist, stateside, homegrown terrorists. Do I need to make a list?

That's another thing that really chaps my hide. While Obama ratchets up the power and pursuit of homegrown U.S. terrorists, why in God's name is he loosening his grip over Muslim extremists who are planning, recruiting and seeking to carry out harm against the very U.S. citizens he has sworn to protect?

Am I missing something?

Has the White House not completely strayed when the president of the United States minimizes the role of Islamic jihadists, reserves the right to assassinate U.S. citizens regarded as terrorists without due process or a trial, increases the powers of law enforcement agencies (such as Interpol) that are not bound to search and seizure laws, sues the state of Arizona for enforcing illegal immigration and border control, and does nothing to prohibit an Islamic victory mega-mosque on the edge of ground zero?

I guess the Obama administration forgot to read the Dec. 4, 1981, Executive Order 12333, signed by then-President Ronald Reagan: "No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination. ... No agency of the Intelligence Community shall participate in or request any person to undertake activities forbidden by this Order."

Tragically, the administration also is abandoning the fundamental principles of due process, habeas corpus and our Constitution, which states in the Sixth Amendment: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence."

God, help us. God, protect U.S. citizens. God, save our courts. God, save our land. God, restore our republic.

(Check out other reasons I oppose the Obama administration in my new patriot service announcement at

Friday, August 27, 2010

Conclusive: Global Distribution of Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO

Conclusive: Global Distribution of Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO -Infowars

Jurriaan Maessen
August 27, 2010

In addition to the recent PrisonPlanet-exclusive Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines For “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction — which outlines the Rockefeller Foundation’s efforts in the 1960s funding research into so-called “anti-fertility vaccines”– another series of documents has surfaced, proving beyond any doubt that the UN Population Fund, World Bank and World Health Organization picked up on it, further developing it under responsibility of a “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation”.

Just four years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched massive funding-operations into anti-fertility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the World Health Organization, World Bank and UN Population Fund. Its mission, according to one of its members, to support:

“basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this international, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”

In regards to the scope of the Task Force’s jurisdiction, the Biotechnology and Development Monitor reported:

“The Task Force acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D in the various working groups and supports research on different approaches, such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG. The Task Force has succeeded in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG-vaccine.”

One of the Task Force members, P.D. Griffin, outlined the purpose and trajectory of these Fertility Regulating Vaccines. Griffin:

“The Task Force has continued to coordinate its research activities with other vaccine development programmes within WHO and with other international and national programmes engaged in the development of fertility regulating vaccines.”

Griffin also admitted to the fact that one of the purposes of the vaccines is the implementation in developing countries. Griffin:

“If vaccines could be developed which could safely and effectively inhibit fertility, without producing unacceptable side effects, they would be an attractive addition to the present armamentarium of fertility regulating methods and would be likely to have a significant impact on family planning programmes.”

Also, one of the advantages of the FRVs over “currently available methods of fertility regulation” the Task Force states, is the following (179):

“low manufacturing cost and ease of delivery within existing health services.”

Already in 1978, the WHO’s Task Force (then called Task Force on Immunological Methods for Fertility Regulation) underlined the usefulness of these vaccines in regards to the possibility of “large scale synthesis and manufacture” of the vaccine:

“The potential advantages of an immunological approach to fertility regulation can be summarized as follows: (a) the possibility of infrequent administration, possibly by paramedical personnel; (b) the use of antigens or antigen fragments, which are not pharmacologically active; and (c) in the case of antigens of known chemical structure, there is the possibility of large-scale synthesis and manufacture of vaccine at relatively low cost.”

In 1976, the WHO Expanded Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction published a report, stating:

“In 1972 the Organization (…) expanded its programme of research in human reproduction to provide an international focus for an intensified effort to improve existing methods of fertility regulation, to develop new methods and to assist national authorities in devising the best ways of providing them on a continuing basis. The programme is closely integrated with other WHO research on the delivery of family planning care by health services, which in turn feeds into WHO’s technical assistance programme to governments at the service level.”

Although the term “Anti-Fertility Vaccine”, coined by the Rockefeller Foundation, was replaced by the more bureaucratic sounding “Fertility Regulating Vaccine (FRV), the programme was obviously the same. Besides, The time line shows conclusively that the WHO, UN Population Fund and World Bank continued on a path outlined by the Rockefellers in the late 1960s. By extensions, it proves that all these organization are perfectly interlocked, best captured under the header “Scientific Dictatorship”. The relationshipbetween the WHO and the Rockefeller Foundation is intense. In the 1986 bulletin of the World Health Organization, this relationship is being described in some detail. While researching the effectiveness of “gossypol” as an “antifertility agent”, the bulletin states:

“The Rockefeller Foundation has supported limited clinical trials in China and smallscale clinical studies in Brazil and Austria. The dose administered in the current Chinese trial has been reduced from 20 mg to 10-15 mg/day during the loading phase in order to see if severe oligospermia rather than consistent azoospermia would be adequate for an acceptable, non-toxic and reversible effect. Meanwhile, both the WHO human reproduction programme and the Rockefeller Foundation are supporting animal studies to better define the mechanism of action of gossypol.”

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

In August of 1992, a series of meetings was held in Geneva, Switzerland, regarding “fertility regulating vaccines”. According to the document Fertility Regulating Vaccines (classified by the WHO with a limited distribution) present at those meetings were scientists and clinicians from all over the globe, including then biomedical researcher of the American Agency for International development, and current research-chief of USAID, Mr. Jeff Spieler.

In 1986 Mr. Spieler declared:

“A new approach to fertility regulation is the development of vaccines directed against human substances required for reproduction. Potential candidates for immunological interference include reproductive hormones, ovum and sperm antigens, and antigens derived from embryonic or fetal tissue.(…). An antifertility vaccine must be capable of safely and effectively inhibiting a human substance, which would need somehow to be rendered antigenic. A fertility-regulating vaccine, moreover, would have to produce and sustain effective immunity in at least 95% of the vaccinated population, a level of protection rarely achieved even with the most successful viral and bacterial vaccines. But while these challenges looked insuperable just a few years ago, recent advances in biotechnology- particularly in the fields of molecular biology, genetic engineering and monoclonal antibody production- are bringing antifertility vaccines into the realm of the feasible.”

“Vaccines interfering with sperm function and fertilization could be available for human testing by the early 1990s”, Spieler wrote.

In order for widespread use of these vaccines, Spieler writes, the vaccine must conquer “variations in individual responses to immunization with fertility-regulating vaccines”.

“Research”, he goes on to say,”is also needed in the field of “basic vaccinology”, to find the best carrier proteins, adjuvants, vehicles and delivery systems.”

In the 1992 document, the problem of “variations in individual responses” is also discussed:

“Because of the genetic diversity of human populations”, states the document, “immune responses to vaccines often show marked differences from one individual to another in terms of magnitude and duration. These differences may be partly or even completely overcome with appropriately engineered FRVs (Fertility Regulating Vaccines) and by improvements in our understanding of what is required to develop and control the immune response elicited by different vaccines.”

The picture emerging from these facts is clear. The WHO, as a global coordinating body, has since the early 70s continued the development of the Rockefeller-funded “anti-fertility vaccine”. What also is becoming clear, is that extensive research has been done to the delivery systems in which these anti-fertility components can be buried, such as regular anti-viral vaccines. It’s a mass-scale anti-fertilization programme with the aim of reducing the world’s population: a dream long cherished by the global elite.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

I-Dosing Bineural-Beats

Bi Neural - Beats is the REAL TERM
Its simply the SENSE Receptor's Ability to Receive SENSE DATA at 2 Different Frequencies, and the Process where the difference is Subtracted leaving the Resonant FREQUENCY
100 Hertz in right ear, 107 Hertz in left ear "Cycles per second" the BRAIN will Subtract 100 from 107 and Equate 7 Cycles per second as a RESONANT FREQUENCY


Music producers have been slipping this technology in to song and advertising to INDUCE THE HYPNOTIC BRAINWAVE ACTIVITY, or the LUST AND WANT implantable MALLEABLE BRAINWAVE STATE
Whats the Concern?
If someone is unaware of the INDUCED STATE BEING INDUCED, they are able to be slipped in to states that they normally would not be in or even sometimes able to access...

I-Dosing: Another Excuse for Government Control Over Our Lives

Kurt Nimmo
August 24, 2010

I don’t know about you, but I am not about to run out and experiment with the latest fad, known as “i-dosing,” a gimmick that supposedly uses binaural tones to create euphoria. “Simply put, i-dosing is the attempt to achieve a perceived drug ‘high’ from listening specially-engineered sounds and music,” reports Psychology Today. “Is it a real drug? Probably not.”

But don’t tell that to the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. The government agency has declared that i-dosing induces the same kind of mind-altering effects as marijuana, cocaine, peyote, and opium. “Kids are going to flock to [i-dose websites] just to see what it is about and it can lead them to other places. If you want to reach these kids and save these kids and keep these kids safe, parents have to be aware, and they’ve got to take action,” said Mark Woodward, the spokesman for the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.

So dire is the threat, Oklahoma’s Mustang High School recently sent home letters to parents warning them of the dangers of i-dosing.

State lawmakers and Congress have yet to catch on and propose draconian laws to prevent this scourge from spreading. But give them time.

Back in 2001 a link between heavy television watching and Alzheimer’s disease was discovered, but the government is not clamoring to outlaw the idiot box or pass laws limiting the number of hours spent before it.

Real honest pharmaceutical drugs — antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones — are in the drinking water supplies of at least 41 million Americans. In addition, illegal drugs like cocaine and LSD end up in water, as a studies in Europe reveal. Not only are public officials not doing anything about this involuntary form of drug dosing, they are refusing to disclose results of pharmaceutical screenings.

But never mind this involuntary dosing — so-called researchers are now advocating the government put lithium in the water in order to curb suicide. “We already know that lithium can act as a powerful mood stabilizer for people with bipolar disorder, and treating people with lithium is also associated with lower suicide rates,” said one researcher, who added that this outrageous prospect “certainly merits more investigation.”

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

Eventually the corporate media will hype the exaggerated threat posed by i-dosing to the point where the government will dream up and enforce – ultimately by way of SWAT team – myriad laws that will add thousands of individuals to the state’s prison-industrial complex.

Kurt Nimmo edits He is the author of Another Day in the Empire: Life In Neoconservative America.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Air Force Issues Memo Warning Soldiers, Employees Not to Read WikiLeaks Docs

Note : Even tho the US Air Force Admits the Information is TRUE, and PUBLICLY available for EVERYONE,

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Australian Soverignty Party

In the Up coming Australian Federal Election only ASP seem to have TRUE TRANSPARENT POLICIES that ENHANCE FREEDOM

"Climate SCAM"
"No Income TAX"
"Fluoride taken out of the water"
"No GM foods"
"Take out the CONDITIONING OF CHILDREN in the EDUCATION indoctrination system"
"Return to the GOLD STANDARD, and take back the PRINTING of money from the FOREIGN OWNED FEDERAL RESERVE who charge interest"
"Investigating and Prossucuting CORRUPTION AND TREASON in the Government and Corporations"

Just to name a few of there Policies that other parties DENY or OBFUSCATE!

I cant tell you who to vote for, i can tell you THERE ARE SOME GOOD CANDIDATES who reveal the truth and the corruption that the MAIN 3 political parties "Liberal,Labor,Greens" have been UNITEDLY supporting for DECADES!

Its time for a CHANGE? and to MOVE FORWARD?
To a Transparent FREE Australia where all criminals ESPECIALLY THE ONES IN PUBLIC OFFICE are held responsible for there ACTIONS AND CHOICES, no longer able to hide behind the masks of compartmentalized ignorance

Wake up Australia... Its time to Clean house, and then make sure that no one responsible for TREASONOUS CRIMES AGAINST AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE go unpunished...

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Brain Control "Intention is the Future of Computing"

Sometime in the next 5 years, Gaming Consoles will be introduced with these...
5 years after that they will be as common as mobile phones

Combined with a portable Processor, and Virtual Reality Glasses, Web-cam, and Wireless-Remote Device Interlinking...

And police officers, Truck Drivers, Reporters, Bankers, Teachers, and Students amongst almost every other profession will be a Walking Talking Recording Playback, Intention based Speed of Thought Interaction on a Global Interlinked Scale...

The Whole "Social Networking" Tweeter/ Face-book, will be replaced by Online Virtual Environments for every Unique Group from Nursing homes, to front line Solders on Secure Networks, From Class mates to Work Mates, To Public and Private Clubs...

What are the Risks?
Well for starters the Device RECORDS YOUR BRAINWAVES AND CORRELATES THEM WITH INTENTIONS, which can be SENT TO YOU FROM EXTERNAL DEVICES, Effectively forcing you to react to the intention override... Hitler would have loved to have a PLAYSTATION BRAIN CONTROL, or XBOX BRAIN CONTROL devices that the German Citizens all downloaded there individual brainwave intentions, like stand up, walk outside wait for the bus, get on the bus, Sit Quietly, get off the bus, walk in to the room with all the SHOWERS???? "Ahherm? Gas Chamber?"

Do not get me Wrong... this Technology is the Future, but it should be TOTALLY ENCRYPTED, with the best standards of data encryption on everyone's individual brainwaves to stop a "Hitler wannabe world ruler" from having the means to gather peoples brainwave intentions...

The last step between Humans and Technology is the Interface between the "DNA syntax Operating system" and the "Brainwave Emanation" that comes from "Consciousness Intention"...
When this final Translation is in place "The Intention to HEAL or Activate DNA, Modify, Repair, or Learn and Develop DNA from Consciousness Intention" will be the Pinnacle of Human Technological Progress, Humanity will be as closely linked to all species of life as they will be to there own consciousness's thoughts...
And Technology its self will begin to take a Backseat role no longer the frontier of exploration and discovery, no longer being placed everywhere with cameras and screens, technology will be seamlessly interlinked in to a more natural responsible transparent manner where the focus of society will be to help individuals develop there Individual potential rather then the current focus on Social or Global Group Tasks and Efforts.

Anyone who Realizes that Humans Interlinking with Computers at the "Speed of Thought Based Intention" will be able to Utilize Efficiency standards that no one can currently accomplish... and the only thing slowing anyone down will be the SPEED OF THE INTERNET! this is why Fiber-optics Is seen as "the Veins that bring life" by all who Realize how technology is going to change how everything is done in the next 5-10 years...

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Is Inovative thinking still Required? is Australia Still trying to be "Relivant and Competitive in the NEW WORLD ORDER" ?

Here is a Direct Quote from the Australian Governments Website
"To remain relevant and competitive in the NEW WORLD ORDER, innovative thinking is required."">

Really where are the REPORTERS WITH INTEGRITY who will ask the REAL QUESTIONS?
Is Australia Still trying to Remain Relevant and Competitive in BUSH's 5th Objective THE NEW WORLD ORDER through the United Nations?

Is Innovative Thinking Still Required to Remain Relevant and Competitive in BUSH's 5th Objective THE NEW WORLD ORDER through the United Nations?

Friday, August 6, 2010

Only 1 Communications item is currently UN-HACKABLE

Note, The governments of the WORLD can TAP IN TO all mobile phones apart from Blackberry...

Most Phone Manufacturers and Providers give the Governments a BACKDOOR, to listen in to the phone and find out your GPS location activate the Camera REMOTLY even when the PHONE IS OFF!

Parents were originally Marketed to with the SALES PITCH
"Find out where your Child is and what there doing ANYTIME ANYWHERE"
Now Countries are BANNING devices like Blackberry that they cant CONTROL to DOMINATE YOUR INFORMATION AND WHEREABOUTS

The Seven Keys of the Internet

Thursday, July 29, 2010 » 11:59am

The BBC has reported that seven very important people right now hold the keys to rebooting the internet in the event of a global catastrophy.

In the event of a cyber attack at least five of these seven people - who will be scattered throughout the world - will be required to travel to a base in the US and boot the internet up again.

The safety initiative, known as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers - or ICANN - has a security protocol system known which protects the integrity of website addresses and ensures websites are legitimate.

The BBC spoke to the UK's representative Paul Kane, based at the University of Bath.

Kane told the BBC he was honoured and excited to be recognised for past achievements and current contributions to global internet security.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

The Global Cooling Warming Changing SCAM

Planned in SECRET to create a GLOBAL TAX to sustain a GLOBAL GOVERNMENT originally Global Cooling, then Warming and since 1998 its cooling again 1998 being the top peak el'nino temperature its been cooling since, hence the change to CLIMATE CHANGE rather then warming by politicians still pushing the scam

In the European Union Integrity allows the TRUTH to be told

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Army plans ‘DNA-blasting’ vaccines for mass innoculations during times of emergency

Aaron Dykes
August 4, 2010

DNA-vaccines are still untested and unsafe, but the Army is working to develop a new class of inoculations that can be rapidly developed and rapidly delivered to servicemen and civilians alike during times of outbreak or emergency.

The approach would utilize a gas-powered ‘gene-gun’ to blast multi-agent DNA-vaccines directly into cells without the use of needles, then stimulate the dosage with ‘electroporation,’ a technique the Army intends to become non-invasive but currently involves surgical exposure to muscle tissue. The mild shock can cause pain and tissue damage.

For gene gun delivery, DNA vaccines are coated onto microscopic gold beads and are deposited into skin cells by gas propulsion. Intramuscular electroporation involves injecting the DNA then quickly applying short electrical pulses to the delivery site. The electrical charge causes temporary pores to form in cellular membranes and facilitates uptake of the DNA vaccines. Electroporation has been found to greatly improve immune responses to DNA vaccines as compared to injection alone, and it allows for delivery of larger quantities of DNA in a single dose, making it suitable for multiagent vaccine delivery.

Central to the scheme is the combination of multiple-vaccine agents. The Army has solicited for the crystallization of the partially-tested vaccine applicator, which after meeting sufficient delivery design, must demonstrate “the combination of at least three DNA vaccines of interest to the military.” This indicates the likelihood that the number of vaccines given troops and the public would increase– a greater degree of medication to meet a ‘growing’ threat from genetically-engineered biological agents and pandemics.

It would also signal a new epoch of vaccinating the public. Thus-far untested synthetic-DNA strands would interact with the human body on a mass-scale for the first time, while the dosing of three or more strands would mark a strong interaction that could have unforeseen reactions in combination. Alternately, it would be more difficult to trace back dangerous vaccines based on symptoms developed after the fact when delivered together.

According to the Army, mastering the process would mean not only more quickly designed vaccinations, but a quicker interaction with the immune system. Further, dosing would be quicker because each recipient would not need a fresh needle, and the contact-free ‘gene gun’ would allow rapid person-to-person administration.

DNA vaccines can be rapidly engineered, readily combined and present minimal safety risks… the technology would also provide both civilian and military populations with a path toward rapid response to unknown, emerging, or genetically engineered pathogens.

Researchers have already exposed that vaccines represent a dangerous chemical interaction that cause brain damage, deadly auto-immune responses and more.

But Army vaccination plans aren’t just about disease resistance, it’s also about conditioning the ‘soldier of the future’– one pumped full of chemical ‘enhancements.’

The Daily Mail has reported on the development of inoculations to combat stress. “Academics say they are close to developing the first vaccine for stress – a single jab that would help us relax without slowing down.”

Similarly, the Pentagon has reportedly been investigating “pain vaccines” that would ideally “block the sense of pain for almost a month,” DARPA researcher Michael Goldblatt stated.

The military has also been eyeing “physical boosters” and “cognitive enhancers” to administer to troops through diet, pills or potentially vaccination delivery as well. The use of “Mitochondrial Energetics” to restore youthful vitality has been suggested, as has the use of modafinil, amphetimines and other stimulants to ‘keep pilots alert and awake’ during combat.

DARPA’s projection for the “Super Soldier of 2030″ includes the utilization of both “Cognitive enhancers” (nutritional, nootropic or other smart drugs) and “physical enhancers” (nutritional, pharmaceutical). “Consumer demand and scientific exploration will yield an explosion in cognitive and physical enhancers, including nootropic (smart) drugs, neural prosthetics, and permanent physical prosthetics,” the report states.

Military personnel are already pumped full of dozens of vaccines, and the perfection of the ‘gene gun’ would only put them one step closer to complete biological-and-chemical manipulation of the soldier.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010


people do exhale carbon dioxide (the rate is approximately 1 kg per day, and it depends strongly on the person's activity level), this carbon dioxide includes carbon that was originally taken out of the carbon dioxide in the air by plants through photosynthesis - whether you eat the plants directly or animals that eat the plants.

One carbon credit is equal to one ton of carbon dioxide

So every 1000 Days a person BREATHS they must BUY A CARBON CREDIT FROM THE ETC SCAM!

This allows the Polluters of TOXIC , BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL, NUCLEAR, Heavy Metals to Continue POLLUTING if they PAY for carbon, Excluding there Real impact by introducing LIFE DESTROYING TOXIC ELEMENTS in to the Environment Killing Nature and Humans, When CARBON IS AN ESSENTIAL BUILDING BLOCK OF LIFE AND MORE CARBON = TREES AND CORRAL GROWS BETTER IT DOESN'T DIE!

Why was it called Climate cooling in the 1950's and 1960's? Then Climate Warming until 1998 was the Warmest year, NO SCIENTIST WILL TELL YOU THERE HAS BEEN A WARMER YEAR THEN 1998 since, 2005 was the next warmest then 2009 showing a DECLINE in the PEAK TEMPERATURES! Now its called CLIMATE CHANGE because they cant deny ITS NOT WARMING ANYMORE!

Notice you pay for more Grams of Carbon then the Item Weighs

8% of all Human caused CO2 emissions are from HUMAN BREATH

Here is the cherry on top, a Website that with the help from the CIA and UNITED NATIONS STATISTICAL DATA have a website "Simulating" the Correlation between BIRTH DEATHS AND CO2, Leave no Doubt this is Eugenics there already Re-Dressing the "Useless Eaters" with "Useless Breathers"